Dealing the problem of heteroscedasticity in Data Envelopment Analysis

Authors

  • Kamatchi K Research Scholar, Department of Statistics, Presidency College, Chennai, India
  • Prakash V Associate Professor & Head, Department of Statistics, Dr. Ambedkar Govt. Arts College, Chennai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n07.021

Keywords:

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Decision Making units (DMU), heteroscedasticity, Efficiency

Abstract

There are various performance or efficiency measurements of similar type of organizations known as Decision Making Units (DMU). One of the effective tools for assessing the effectiveness of DMUs is the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. However, the presence of heteroscedasticity in the inputs and outputs affect the results of DEA. By computing the efficiency estimates in this work, the author tried to eliminate the heteroscedasticity. Additionally, for the sake of an empirical inquiry, the author took into account information on non-life insurance businesses in India. The study's goal is to determine how heteroscedasticity affects DEA efficiency estimations.

References

Bojanic A, Candil S and Ford J (1998) Small sample properties of ML, COLS and DEA estimators of frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity.

Goldfeld SM and Quandt RE (1972) Non-Linear methods in Econometrics. North-Holland: Amsterdam.

Huang, W., & Eling, M. (2013). An efficiency comparison of the non-life insurance industry in the BRIC countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 577-591.

Jasmine Rathi S, Prakash v (2019) Relative Technical efficiency of Life Insurance companies DEA and Interval DEA methods, International Journal of Recent Technologies and Engineering, Volume 8, Issue-4S5.

Muhammad Sani, Habshah Midi and Babangida Ebrahim Babura (2019) Robust white’s test for heteroscedasticity detection in linear regression, FUDMA Journal of Sciences, Volume 3 No.2.

Sengupta JK (1990) Transformations in stochastic DEA models. J Econ46: 109-123.

Sengupta JK (1996) Stochastic efficiency measurement. Appl Econ Lett 4:125-128.

Solow RM (1997) Learning from Learning by Doing: Lessons for Economic Growth. Standard university press: Stanford, CA.

Sengupta JK(2002) Level and growth efficiency under technological change, Research paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Sengupta JK(2003) Growth efficiency in the computer industry, Research paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Sengupta JK (2005) Data Envelopment Analysis with Heterogeneous data: an application, Journal of Operation Research Society, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Tanuj Mathur, Ujjwal Kanti Paul (2014), Performance Appraisal of Indian Non-Life Insurance, Universal Journal of Management 2(5): 173-185.

Muhammad Sani, Habshah Midi, and Babangida Ebrahim Babura (2019), Robust White’s Test for Heteroscedasticity Detection in Linear Regression, FUDMA Journal of Sciences (FDJ) Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2019, pp 173-177.

Downloads

Published

15-07-2023

How to Cite

K, K., & V, P. (2023). Dealing the problem of heteroscedasticity in Data Envelopment Analysis. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 8(7), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n07.021