Evolution of Hindu Succession Law: A Comparative Study of the Yājñavalkyasmṛti and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n06.049Keywords:
Yājñavalkyasmṛti, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Law, Inheritance, Succession, Partition, Mitākṣarā, DayabhāgaAbstract
The law of succession constitutes a fundamental branch of jurisprudence that governs the devolution of property and proprietary rights after the death of an individual. Within the Hindu legal tradition, the principles of inheritance evolved through the Smṛtis and their authoritative commentaries, which profoundly influenced the development of classical Hindu jurisprudence. Among these, the Yājñavalkyasmṛti occupies a distinguished position for its systematic exposition of legal doctrines relating to partition, inheritance, and succession. Many of its principles subsequently formed the basis of the Mitākṣarā and Dayabhāga schools of Hindu law, which continued to regulate succession until the enactment of modern statutory legislation. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 introduced significant legal reforms by codifying and modernising the law of intestate succession while promoting greater uniformity and gender equity. The present study undertakes a comparative analysis of the law of succession as expounded in the Yājñavalkyasmṛti and the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. It critically examines the concepts of inheritance, partition, coparcenary rights, succession to ancestral property, and the legal position of female heirs under both legal systems. The study further explores the extent to which the ancient jurisprudential principles have been retained, modified, or superseded by contemporary legislation in response to changing social and constitutional values. By analysing the continuity as well as the transformation of Hindu succession law, the paper demonstrates that although the statutory framework has introduced substantial reforms—particularly with respect to women's inheritance rights—the foundational concepts developed in the Yājñavalkyasmṛti continue to influence modern Hindu jurisprudence. The study highlights the enduring relevance of classical Sanskrit legal literature in understanding the historical evolution and contemporary development of Hindu succession law.
References
Ṛgveda Saṃhitā. Vaidika Saṃśodhana Maṇḍala, Pune, Vols. I–V, 1972.
Yājñavalkyasmṛti with the Mitākṣarā Commentary of Vijñāneśvara. Edited by Yajnavalkya; Mitramisra; Vijñāneśvara; S. V. Parulekar, 1936
Jolly J. The Nāradasmṛti, Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 33. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1889
Kane, P. V. History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India). Vol. III. Pune: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Derrett, J. D. M. Introduction to Modern Hindu Law. Oxford University Press, 1963.
Derrett, J. D. M. A Critique of Modern Hindu Law. Tripathi, 1970.
Mulla, Dinshaw Fardunji. Mulla: Principles of Hindu Law. 23rd ed., LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2018.
Mayne, John D. Mayne's Treatise on Hindu Law and Usage. Revised by Vijender Kumar. Bharat Law House, 2025.
Agarwala, R. K. Hindu Law. Central Law Agency, 2017.
Paras Diwan. Modern Hindu Law. Allahabad Law Agency; 27th ed., 2025.
Misra, J. R. (Ed.). Mayne's Treatise on Hindu Law and Usage. Bharat Law House, 2016.
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Act No. 30 of 1956), as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
Neelam Kumar Jain. Commentary on the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Bharat Law House, 2025.
M. R. Mallick. Ray's Commentaries on the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. 5th ed., Kamal Law House, 2015.
Bhandarkar, D. R. Some Aspects of Ancient Hindu Polity.
Lingat, Robert. The Classical Law of India. Translated by J. Duncan M. Derrett. University of California Press, 1973.
Olivelle, Patrick. Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra. Oxford University Press, 2005.
Menski, Werner. Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, (2020) 9 SCC 1.
Prakash v. Phulavati, (2016) 2 SCC 36.
Danamma @ Suman Surpur v. Amar, (2018) 3 SCC 343.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).