The Digital Divide as a Social Justice Issue: Examining Disparities in Educational Technology Access and Outcomes

Authors

  • Dr. Charandas Yuvraj Kamble Associate Professor, Government College of Education, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n11.050

Keywords:

digital divide, educational technology, social justice, digital literacy, educational equity, meaningful connectivity, human rights

Abstract

The digital divide in education has evolved from a binary question of technology access to a complex, multidimensional phenomenon with profound implications for social justice. This paper examines disparities in educational technology access and outcomes through the lens of social justice, arguing that the digital divide represents not merely a technological gap but a fundamental equity concern that perpetuates existing social inequalities. Drawing on contemporary research and theoretical frameworks, the study analyses the three levels of the digital divide—access, skills and usage, and tangible outcomes—and their differential impact on marginalized communities. The paper employs a systematic review methodology, synthesizing findings from 35 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, along with policy documents from international organizations including UNESCO, the European Union, and the World Bank. Key findings reveal that while infrastructure gaps persist, particularly in rural and low-income settings, the second-level divide (digital literacy) and third-level divide (outcome disparities) now constitute the most significant barriers to educational equity. The COVID-19 pandemic starkly illuminated these disparities, with vulnerable populations—including low-income students, rural learners, children with disabilities, and refugees—experiencing disproportionate educational disruption. The paper concludes by proposing a human rights-based framework for addressing digital inequality, emphasizing that meaningful connectivity, digital literacy as a fundamental competency, and inclusive policy design are essential preconditions for educational equity in an increasingly digitized world.

References

Bawa, I., & Bawa, S. (2025). Bridging EdTech gaps: Examining learning equity in low-income educational settings. Computers & Education, 105409.

Tang, Q., Kamarudin, S., Abdul Rahman, S. N., & Zhang, X. (2025). Bridging gaps in online learning: A systematic literature review on the digital divide. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 161–176.

European Parliament. (2025). Parliamentary question: Addressing digital inequality in education, treating it as a threat to EU cohesion. E-000814/2025.

Assefa, Y., Gebremeskel, M. M., Moges, B. T., Tilwani, S. A., & Azmera, Y. A. (2025). Rethinking the digital divide and associated educational in(equity) in higher education in the context of developing countries: The social justice perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(1), 15–32.

(2025). Digital media use and availability can mitigate the digital divide: Meta-analytic insights from PISA 2022. Computers & Education, 238, 105409.

Martin, K. (2025). Could zero-rating advance meaningful connectivity in education? UNESCO.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: The imperative for a human rights-based approach to digital literacy.

Tang, Q., Kamarudin, S., Abdul Rahman, S. N., & Zhang, X. (2025). Bridging gaps in online learning: A systematic literature review on the digital divide. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 161–176.

UNESCO. (2025). AI and education: Protecting the rights of learners.

Benkhadra, R. (2025). Bridging or widening the gap? Assessing digitalisation's impact on inclusive education for vulnerable children in Africa. GC Human Rights Preparedness.

Downloads

Published

15-11-2025

How to Cite

Kamble, C. Y. (2025). The Digital Divide as a Social Justice Issue: Examining Disparities in Educational Technology Access and Outcomes. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(11), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n11.050