Technology Acceptance and the Digital Divide: A Comparative study of an Urban and a Rural College in Sikkim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n10.038Keywords:
Communication Technologies, Technology Acceptance Model, Perceived UsefulnessAbstract
In contemporary society, technology has become so much of our lives that it has changed everything we knew about learning and work and communication. In the context of education, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have improved the students learning, the teaching skills, and the access to knowledge (Hussain et al., 2013). But there are still disparities in how people view and accept technology. Variations in system users’ intention to use technology are explained by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which examines the two primary determinants of users usage behaviour as Perceived Usefulness (PU) and ease of use (PEOU) (Davis, 1989). These variables determine users technology acceptance and their behaviour. In India, the question of the digital divide between rural and urban students is a pressing concern. Although the urban students relatively have access to better infrastructure of ICT, students in rural settings face challenges related to poor network connectivity, poor electricity supply and low level of digital literacy (Nivetha & Radha, 2024). In this paper, TAM is combined with the framework of digital divide to investigate how the gap in access, ownership of devices, and digital skills influence technology acceptance. By examining both technological perceptions and structural inequalities, the study aims to provide insights into promoting equitable digital access and enhancing educational opportunities across diverse contexts.
References
Hussain, S., Wang, Z., & Rahim, S. (2013). E-learning services for rural communities. International Journal of Computer Applications, 68(5), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5120/11574-6888
Kumar, B. T. S., & Kumara, S. U. S. (2014). The digital divide in India: use and non-use of ICT by rural and urban students. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 31(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2013-0030
Ramalingam, A., & Kar, S. S. (2020). Is there a digital divide among school students? An exploratory study from Puducherry. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 45(3), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_204_19
Laskar, M. H. (2023). Examining the emergence of digital society and the digital divide in India: A comparative evaluation between urban and rural areas. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1145235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145235
Nivetha, R., & Radha, B. (2024). Digital divide: A comparison of undergraduate female students’ use of social media platforms in urban and rural areas. International Journal of Emerging Technologies (IJET), 15(1), 1–11.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Elsharif, T. A. A. (2017). Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to measure the extent of using Microsoft Excel program by Libyan accountants: An empirical study. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(12), 165–172.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Kurinchi Vanan, C., & Subramani, R. (2015). Digital divide: Rural and urban college students’ attitude towards technology acceptance. International Journal of Communication and Media Studies (IJCMS), 5(6), 1–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).