Evacuee Property and the State: Legal Battles and Bureaucratic Challenges in Post-Partition India

Authors

  • Prof. Krishna Kant Sharma Head Department of History, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut
  • Monika Research Scholar, Department of History, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n7.028

Keywords:

Partition of India, Evacuee Property, Displacement, Refugee Rehabilitation

Abstract

The Partition of India in 1947 triggered an unprecedented displacement of millions, resulting in a vast number of properties being left behind by those forced to migrate across the newly created borders. In response, the Indian state introduced the "evacuee property" regime to manage and redistribute these abandoned assets. This paper critically examines the legal and bureaucratic challenges that emerged in the aftermath of Partition, focusing on how the state attempted to regulate ownership, ensure refugee rehabilitation, and maintain administrative control through legislation such as the Evacuee Property Act. Despite these efforts, the implementation was marked by procedural ambiguities, political manipulation, and institutional delays, often intensifying the suffering of displaced communities. Drawing on legal documents, court rulings, and oral histories, the study explores how the evacuee property framework shaped questions of citizenship, justice, and belonging in postcolonial India. It reveals how the state’s attempts to balance legal order and humanitarian response often faltered, leaving a legacy that continues to influence property rights and communal dynamics in the subcontinent.

References

Kudaisya, G. (2001). The aftermath of partition in South Asia. Routledge. pp. 118–121

Bhasin, A. S. (1998). India–Pakistan relations: 1947–2007: A documentary study. Geetika Publishers. Vol. 1, pp. 27–29

Menon, R. (2017). Remnants of Partition: 21 Objects from a Continent Divided. Hurst Publishers. pp. 193–196

Government of India. (1954). The Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (Act No. 44 of 1954). Ministry of Law and Justice. Retrieved from https://legislative.gov.in

Hasan, M. (2001). Partition Narratives in India Partitioned: The Other Face of Freedom. Roli Books. Vol. 2, pp. 161–163

Bhalla, A. S. (2000). Politics of Refugees in South Asia: Identity, Resistance, and Accomodation. Routledge. pp. 89–91

Jain, M. P. (2010). Indian constitutional law. LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur. 6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1183–1185

Basu, D. D. (2013). Commentary on the Constitution of India. LexisNexis. Vol. 9, pp. 72–75

Kaur, R. (2007). Since 1947: Partition Narratives among Punjabi Migrants of Delhi. Oxford University Press. pp. 115–118

Zamindar, V. F. Y. (2007). The long partition and the making of modern South Asia: Refugees, boundaries, histories. Columbia University Press. pp. 65–68

Rajagopal, K. (2016, March 9). Enemy Property Ordinance deprives heirs of rights. The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com

Downloads

Published

12-07-2025

How to Cite

Sharma, K. K., & Monika. (2025). Evacuee Property and the State: Legal Battles and Bureaucratic Challenges in Post-Partition India. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(7), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n7.028