Thermodynamics of Black Holes: Theoretical Developments and Information Paradox

Authors

  • Prashant Bhagwanrao Bunde Research Scholar, Department of Theoretical Physics, The English High School & Junior College, Ner, Yavatmal, Maharashtra
  • Dr Namdev Pawar Research Guide, Department of Theoretical Physics, The English High School & Junior College, Ner, Yavatmal, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n7.018

Keywords:

Dynamics of black holes, Hawking radiation, Bekenstein entropy, Information paradox, Holography, Firewall problem

Abstract

One of the most significant and puzzling and fecund fields of modern physics is the thermodynamics of black holes: a paradigm that has emerged through the meeting of general relativity with quantum field theory. These mysterious gravitational objects, which were thought to be empty darkness, have exposed highly thermodynamic features such as temperature, entropy, and evaporation. Black holes have been reinterpreted in a thermodynamic picture by the work of Bekenstein and Hawking, who found that classical views of event horizons and conservation laws are no longer valid. As a theoretical possibility, the Hawking radiation led to the introduction of a quantum mechanical instability of black hole spacetimes, unleashing an avalanche of discussions about the process of black hole evaporation, the fate of information, and the final geometry of spacetime. The information paradox that ensued because of the firewall hypothesis is what ardently raises debate even today. At the same time, the development of string theory and holography (especially in the realization of the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory correspondence) has provided possible solutions as well by subsuming black hole entropy and unitarity into more encompassing theories. Thermodynamic basis, Hawking radiation, the entropy-area law, information paradox, and holographic advancement are discussed in a very systematic and critical way in this paper. The paper has helped to prove that the role of a black hole as an astrophysical object is just one of its dimensions because it can also be used to obtain a tool to unite quantum mechanics and gravity.

References

Auffinger, J. (2023). Primordial black hole constraints with Hawking radiation—A review. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 131, 104040.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.02672

Singh, S. (2024). Black hole microstates and entropy. Preprints (October, 2024). https://doi. org/10.20944/preprints202410, 368, v1.https://www.preprints.org/frontend/manuscript/f9ea1a915bc49356ae01e9906d82a308/download_pub

Ong, Y. C. (2022). On black hole thermodynamics, singularity, and gravitational entropy. General Relativity and Gravitation, 54(10), 132.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.16856

Zivieri, R. (2023). Trends in the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy, 25(9), 1321.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/25/9/1321

Nojiri, S. I., Odintsov, S. D., & Faraoni, V. (2022). New entropies, black holes, and holographic dark energy. Astrophysics, 65(4), 534-551.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.10235

Perez, A. (2023). Black Hole Entropy and Planckian Discreteness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19389.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.19389

Strasberg, P., & Winter, A. (2021). First and second law of quantum thermodynamics: A consistent derivation based on a microscopic definition of entropy. PRX Quantum, 2(3), 030202.https://link.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030202

Sethna, J. P. (2021). Statistical mechanics: entropy, order parameters, and complexity (Vol. 14). Oxford University Press.https://sethna.lassp.cornell.edu/StatMech/ErrataFirstPrinting.pdf

Crowther, K. (2025). Why Do We Want a Theory of Quantum Gravity?. Elements in the Philosophy of Physics.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.04858

Dulani, S. (2024). Black Hole Paradoxes: A Unified Framework for Information Loss.https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24511/7/S.Dulani_Dissertation_Post%20Online.pdf

Shankaranarayanan, S., & Johnson, J. P. (2022). Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?. General Relativity and Gravitation, 54(5), 44.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.06533

Taschetto, D. (2024). The Thermodynamic Origins and Dynamical Foundations of Quantum Discontinuity.https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/23131/1/PhD%20Thesis%20-%20DT.pdf

Almeida, C. R. (2021). The thermodynamics of black holes: from Penrose process to Hawking radiation. The European Physical Journal H, 46(1), 20.https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00022-9.pdf

Flanagan, É. É. (2021). Infrared effects in the late stages of black hole evaporation. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(7), 1-36.https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP07(2021)137.pdf

Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022). Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review. The European Physical Journal C, 82(5), 463.https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1.pdf

Capellmann, H. (2021). Space-time in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 51(2), 44.https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-021-00441-0.pdf

Ule, D. (2025). Quantum Informational Geometrodynamics: A Critical Self-Review and Comparison with Current Fundamental Physics.https://osf.io/v2x47/download

Chen, B., Czech, B., & Wang, Z. Z. (2022). Quantum information in holographic duality. Reports on Progress in Physics, 85(4), 046001.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09188

Polchinski, J. (2022). Memories of a Theoretical Physicist: A Journey across the Landscape of Strings, Black Holes, and the Multiverse. MIT Press.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.09093

Bolonkin, A. (2009). Converting of matter to nuclear energy by ab-generator. Am. J. Eng. Applied Sci, 2, 683-693. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander-Bolonkin/publication/41025203_Converting_of_Matter_to_Nuclear_Energy_by_AB-Generator/links/54debbbf0cf2510fcee4b1b7/Converting-of-Matter-to-Nuclear-Energy-by-AB-Generator.pdf

Arévalo, V. A., Andrade, D., & Rojas, C. (2024). Time evolution of the Von Neumann entropy for a Kerr–Taub–NUT black hole. The European Physical Journal C, 84(9), 932. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13290-8

Cinti, E., & Sanchioni, M. (2021). The devil in the (implicit) details: On the amps paradox and its resolution. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 60(9), 3234-3253. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-021-04901-1

Jahn, A., & Eisert, J. (2021). Holographic tensor network models and quantum error correction: a topical review. Quantum Science and Technology, 6(3), 033002. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-9565/ac0293/meta

Downloads

Published

12-07-2025

How to Cite

Bunde, P. B., & Pawar, N. (2025). Thermodynamics of Black Holes: Theoretical Developments and Information Paradox. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(7), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n7.018