The Concept of Universal with Special Reference to Russell: A Brief Exposition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n04.037Keywords:
Universal, Particular, Realism, Nominalist, IdealismAbstract
There is a rising propensity to dismiss the universal problem as purely linguistic and unimportant from a philosophical standpoint. Before delving further into this issue, it may be prudent to ask ourselves whether there is even a flimsy basis for acknowledging that there are universals at all. Understanding universals is important because without them, thinking would seem to be impossible. Because concepts are the foundation of thought and generality is implied by concepts. Without universals, remembering every specific event we have throughout our lives would be incredibly challenging, if not impossible. If such a thing is ever possible, we will have to use a specific proper name for each specific, which would require the use of numerous proper names and their retention in memory. However, it is virtually difficult to do this. In this essay, I have critically examined the idea of universal with a focus on Russell.
References
Cf. Nature of Thought, Brand Blanshard, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., First Published 1939, Fourth Impression, 1964
My Philosophical Development, B. Russell, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., First Published on, 2nd Impression 1959. p. 163.
ibid, p. 167.
ibid, p. 171.
History of Western Philosophy, Bertrand Russell, Unwin University Book First Published ion, Tenth Impression 1967. p.139.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).